A school bus driver in a Charlotte, NC school bus company had a surprise encounter early last week when a van blocked the bus's path mid route. Four men, masked by red bandannas, exited the van and approached Bus 112. The first man to reach the bus started to beat on its hood, causing an estimated $100 worth of damage. At the same time a second man attempted to board the school bus by kicking the door in. The driver was able to move around the bus at this point, and returned to school to wait for a new bus to bring the students home. Thankfully, none of the students, or the 23-year-old driver was hurt.
Police believe this happened because the driver was accused of assaulting students on his bus earlier that week, although he was proven to have been falsely accused. The man who was caught claimed that it was an act of protest against the driver’s alleged abuse. Police are still on the lookout for the other three men who were involved.
This article is strangely disturbing to me. I can understand, and am happy that community members would stand against someone else’s wrong deeds. Abusing anyone, let alone students is wrong; I just don't think that the way they went about doing it was appropriate. Putting all those other students at risk; who knows what they would have done had they been successful in boarding that school bus. Having put those children through such an experience is not something to be taken lightly and should never be done.
Thank You,
Haleigh
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Monday, April 23, 2012
We Have a Deer and a Turkey, Why Not Add a Duck?
For those out there that are keeping track,we have heard about both a deer and a turkey crashing through school bus windshields. Well I'm writing today to let you know that we can now add a duck to that list of hitch hiking animals.
What a strange world we live in. I'll admit that this recent trend of wild animals attemping to ride the school bus has me thoroughly entertained. That being said I'm curious about other animals that have done this or something similar. Leave me a comment to let me know of any you have seen or heard of.
Thank You,
Haleigh
Thank You,
Haleigh
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
School Buses are Fighting for Their Riders Saftey

Deltona Florida did something I think is truly amazing on this Wednesday, April 11th. The Sheriff's Department and the Volusia County school district teamed up in a county wide safety enforcement operation to ensure students are able to be transported safely. In one day, eight people were ticketed for passing a stopped school bus, 25 people were ticketed for speeding while another 40 people were ticketed for other miscellaneous violations. There was also someone who was driving with a suspended license. That's pretty impressive and extremely sad.
From my understanding of the article, (which can be read if you click on this post's title) the unmarked cars were placed in areas where school buses were active and reports of unsafe driving had been made. What I mean to say is that school buses are big and bright yellow making them very hard to miss so there is no excuse for not stopping, or no reason to drive carelessly around one. There are children on board or in the immediate area. Slow down, stop, and be aware of what is around you.
The goal was to educate the public. I would love to have our buses watched for a day and see what happens. Would we have as many violations of the law? Are there still people that are unaware that passing a stopped bus with re lights flashing and stop arm extended is illegal? What I want to know most though, is if the people who were stopped would pass again if the opportunity arises?
Thank You,
Haleigh
Labels:
Employee education,
In the News,
Public education,
Safety
Monday, April 9, 2012
Boy Sets Bus on Fire by Flare
A 12 year-old boy set his school bus on fire during its route back in mid-march. It was just shy of 8:30 am when the boy ignited a marine flare resulting in the student-filled bus going up in flames. As soon as it went off, the bus started to fill with smoke and all the students and the driver were evacuated immediately. The students were stranded on the side of Chestertown Road (Route 20) for some time before help arrived.
Seven students were taken to Chester River Hospital and treated for minor smoke inhalation, while the other 21 were removed from the scene and brought to Chestertown Middle School. All treated students are fine, and were released immediately from the hospital. The school bus on the other hand is a complete loss with an estimated total of $45,000 in damages.

The boy who set the bus on fire has been charged with first and second degree arson, first and second degree malicious burning, bringing a deadly weapon on school property, carrying/transporting a handgun, disturbing the peace and 28 counts of reckless endangerment. It is a shame that one student's less-than-stellar idea can cause trouble to everyone around him.
Thank You,
Haleigh
Seven students were taken to Chester River Hospital and treated for minor smoke inhalation, while the other 21 were removed from the scene and brought to Chestertown Middle School. All treated students are fine, and were released immediately from the hospital. The school bus on the other hand is a complete loss with an estimated total of $45,000 in damages.

The boy who set the bus on fire has been charged with first and second degree arson, first and second degree malicious burning, bringing a deadly weapon on school property, carrying/transporting a handgun, disturbing the peace and 28 counts of reckless endangerment. It is a shame that one student's less-than-stellar idea can cause trouble to everyone around him.
Thank You,
Haleigh
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Charged for Candy
Rules are made for a reason. Morgan Linder found that out the hard way last Thursday when he broke the rules and was arrested. The charge is the felony of throwing a deadly missile into an occupied vehicle. That sounds worse then it is to me but Linder's actions of throwing Jaw Breakers out the school bus window and at the truck next to the bus fits the charge.
The woman in the truck suffered a contusion and followed the bus until she was able to speak with the driver. She also called 911 and waited with the bus until the police arrived. Surveillance footage from inside the bus showed that Linder was the culprit. Shortly after he was charged he was released to his parents since he is only 15-years-old. Still, fifteen is old enough to know better.
To all bus riders: NEVER put ANYTHING out your buses window!
Click here to read the original article.
Thank You,
Haleigh
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Student Drives School Bus into a House!
Down in South Carolina a town known as Allendale is changing their school bus policy because of an incident that occurred on Thursday. After school a 19-year-old special education student was upset after being told he needed to go home and was not able to watch the other students play sports. After a verbal fight, the student ran away from his adult attendant and towards a bus. The bus was empty and the student found the spare key, started the bus, and drove off.
He made it about four miles before crashing into a house. Fortunately, only minor injuries were caused to the student and house's resident. Investigations are still underway as to whose fault it is, and as to whether or not the student will need to be charged with anything. The new school bus policy states that no bus, in use (without a driver present) or parked at base, will ever have its keys left in it.
It is unfortunate that most problems, as unlikely as some of them are, only occur to us or are fixed after an incident has happened.
Thank You,
Haleigh
He made it about four miles before crashing into a house. Fortunately, only minor injuries were caused to the student and house's resident. Investigations are still underway as to whose fault it is, and as to whether or not the student will need to be charged with anything. The new school bus policy states that no bus, in use (without a driver present) or parked at base, will ever have its keys left in it.
It is unfortunate that most problems, as unlikely as some of them are, only occur to us or are fixed after an incident has happened.
Thank You,
Haleigh
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
On Privatization...
I recall teachers and professors frequently (please note I didn't say "always") commenting on the danger of using sweeping generalization. "A sweeping generalization," according to San Jose University professors, "is one in which there seems to be sufficient evidence offered to draw a conclusion, but the conclusion drawn far exceeds what the evidence supports."
It often occurs to me that many people, including many journalists, missed those sweeping generalization lectures. Today I read an article in the Minneapolis Labor Review (No. 11, March 23, 2012) about the Robinsdale School District voting to outsource their transportation to a private company. The decision was made because the school district's skyrocketing costs are out of line with what other districts are paying for transportation. Apparently, the community is in an uproar. I think that's typical of any community facing a massive change that affects students.
However, I would imagine, as is the case in most similar situations, that drivers will be offered employment with the new private company. And lest we get caught up in the debate about the quality of the private company, I assert that the company will be as good as the local manager. If that person cares about the community, and is good at running school bus operations, the community is going to have a positive experience. If the reverse is true, the community will not have a positive experience. In my opinion, the quality of the transportation operation rests on the shoulders of all Transportation Managers, whether employed by School Districts or by private contractors, nation-wide.
What I don't care for, and always object to, is the people who paint all private companies with the same brush, the brush of sweeping generalizion. It's very much like what happens when fanatics start dicussing evil corporations (all corporations are bad and all corporations are destroying the fabric of our country - to which I always interject, "Mine isn't.) Consider the following comments from the article:
We are a private company.
We operate every day with student safety as our first, though not only, priority. We also care about accountability to our School District, our community, our customers, and our employees.
Our drivers, though non-union employees, care about their students, often going to great lengths to make a student's day better. We are not regularly late, although we have had the rare situation that results in tardiness. Our drivers don't stop to smoke, leaving kids unattended or in unsafe situations. We have disallowed cell phone use while our vehicles are in operation long before the law disallowed it. I have many other examples of this particular private company leading the way along safe paths (implementing drug and alcohol testing before it was mandatory, requesting improvements to bus design, leading the way in student and public education, and belonging to our community...).
I don't think that was the point of the article.
Really, the crux of the matter has nothing to do with student safety or the contributions of private contractors to student transportation in the state of Minnesota. The crux, I believe, appears in one of the final paragraphs of the article:
First, when did "profit" become a bad word? Profit, essentially, is ending the month with a little cash left in the bank after all the bills and expenses are paid. And honestly, don't we all want to make a profit? And understand, I am referring to modest, reasonable profits; I think multi-million dollar packages for CEOs of corporations are ridiculous and insane.
Further, if that private bus company can provide safe and efficient transportation services and if they can offer those services for less than what the district is paying currently (even including their nasty profit), why wouldn't tax payers be in favor of reducing costs?
Seems like a no-brainer to me.
Safe Driving!
Kari
It often occurs to me that many people, including many journalists, missed those sweeping generalization lectures. Today I read an article in the Minneapolis Labor Review (No. 11, March 23, 2012) about the Robinsdale School District voting to outsource their transportation to a private company. The decision was made because the school district's skyrocketing costs are out of line with what other districts are paying for transportation. Apparently, the community is in an uproar. I think that's typical of any community facing a massive change that affects students.
However, I would imagine, as is the case in most similar situations, that drivers will be offered employment with the new private company. And lest we get caught up in the debate about the quality of the private company, I assert that the company will be as good as the local manager. If that person cares about the community, and is good at running school bus operations, the community is going to have a positive experience. If the reverse is true, the community will not have a positive experience. In my opinion, the quality of the transportation operation rests on the shoulders of all Transportation Managers, whether employed by School Districts or by private contractors, nation-wide.
What I don't care for, and always object to, is the people who paint all private companies with the same brush, the brush of sweeping generalizion. It's very much like what happens when fanatics start dicussing evil corporations (all corporations are bad and all corporations are destroying the fabric of our country - to which I always interject, "Mine isn't.) Consider the following comments from the article:
- Speaker after speaker expressed fears for student safety if transportation is handed over to a private contractor.
- Privatizing is bad for students, parents, taxpayers...
- Busses [sic] currently operated by private contractors are regularly late and students tell her stories of those private contractor's drivers stopping to smoke or talk on cell phones.
We are a private company.
We operate every day with student safety as our first, though not only, priority. We also care about accountability to our School District, our community, our customers, and our employees.
Our drivers, though non-union employees, care about their students, often going to great lengths to make a student's day better. We are not regularly late, although we have had the rare situation that results in tardiness. Our drivers don't stop to smoke, leaving kids unattended or in unsafe situations. We have disallowed cell phone use while our vehicles are in operation long before the law disallowed it. I have many other examples of this particular private company leading the way along safe paths (implementing drug and alcohol testing before it was mandatory, requesting improvements to bus design, leading the way in student and public education, and belonging to our community...).
I don't think that was the point of the article.
Really, the crux of the matter has nothing to do with student safety or the contributions of private contractors to student transportation in the state of Minnesota. The crux, I believe, appears in one of the final paragraphs of the article:
If the district contracts out for its school bus operations, school district dollars will become a source of profit for a private bus company, instead of going towards [sic] union wage jobs and benefits.
First, when did "profit" become a bad word? Profit, essentially, is ending the month with a little cash left in the bank after all the bills and expenses are paid. And honestly, don't we all want to make a profit? And understand, I am referring to modest, reasonable profits; I think multi-million dollar packages for CEOs of corporations are ridiculous and insane.
Further, if that private bus company can provide safe and efficient transportation services and if they can offer those services for less than what the district is paying currently (even including their nasty profit), why wouldn't tax payers be in favor of reducing costs?
Seems like a no-brainer to me.
Safe Driving!
Kari
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
When Turkeys Attack!

In Cumberland County, New Jersey one bus had a very unexpected passenger. Edwin Ramos was driving the bus last Friday morning on County Route 553 when a turkey smashed through the windshield. Yes, a turkey actually went through the school buses' window. While the bird did not survive the crash, Ramos and three students on board had to be treated for minor injuries they got from the shattered glass.
If you can remember back to november, a deer also went through the windsheild of a school bus. Causing excessive damage but no injuries since the bus was empty. I dont know what has been up with all these animals trying to get rides on the bus but I can think of a few better ways to do it.
Thank You,
Haleigh
Monday, March 5, 2012
Kindergarten Here We Come!
Tonight we meet with the new kindergarten students starting school in September. Please view our presentation and see what we have to say to the students and their parents.
This is the most exciting time of the year for us!
Kindergarten Students
This is the most exciting time of the year for us!
Kindergarten Students
Friday, March 2, 2012
On Board Bus Monitors
In Idaho Falls, Idaho, Bonneville County Joint School District (JSD) 93 is taking a proactive stance on school bus bullying. They are launching a program that will hopefully solve not only the bullying but other behavior and discipline problems happening on board. Five years ago they had security cameras installed in their buses as a first step in this fight, but when the feed-back came in, it wasn't as good as they wanted.
Now they are trying to have adult bus monitors on board. This is a volunteer position and they have no active role in disciplining the students. The monitors will be given a clip board on which they are to record and keep track of the behavioral problems for the day. They will also be in charge of handing out "Bus Bucks" which the students can turn for prizes.

They do not expect to have someone on every route and so they plan to try to disperse the volunteers evenly through-out this trial period. To be a volunteer they must first undergo a back ground check, the same one the school uses. For extra help with the program (JSD) 93 is looking into recruiting at retirement establishments.
I think this is a great idea! We will sometimes have extra people on board when we are told about repeated incidents. If we could prevent problems by simply having an extra set of adult eyes present it would be wonder. It is also an easy way to be active in your community if you are someone who takes pleasure in helping others! I wish you luck (JSD) 93!
Thank You,
Haleigh
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)